Monday, August 29, 2016
Panama City property auction seeks qualified buyers
Monday, March 03, 2014
Panama’s agriculture sector modernises and looks abroad
Trade deals
Enhancing infrastructure
Monday, September 02, 2013
Panama: Real estate on solid foundations
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Nikki Beach owners want Panama resort to stop using its name
While U.S. courts may be appropriate venue for a legal action under U.S. law, a winning plaintiff could find problems when enforcing a judgment against assets abroad of the foreign defendant unless proper notice of the initial action from the beginning.
The 2007 article gives an idea of the high expections under which the original project was sold to individuals. Thse buyers may be the ones left to lose more as they purchased relying on an internationally known brand of the "sexiest hotel in the world".
Nikki Beach Panama holds "Launching with Stars" http://mensual.prensa.com/mensual/contenido/2008/01/26/hoy/sociales.shtml Photo: Lucia Penrod and Rugiere Galvez, from prensa. com.
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Panama Arbitration Panel Rules in Favor of Foreign Property Buyers
A decision from a Panama arbitration panel upholds rights of foreign property buyers against local real estate developers.
Panama City, Panama ---- The Panama Center of Conciliation and Arbitration rendered an interesting decision regarding a purchase contract involving local companies as sellers and U.S.-resident foreign nationals as buyers of an apartment in Panama City. The decision is an exception to a string of abuses committed by local developers against foreign investors.
The economic group which developed and sold the residential apartment project and its individual architect as member of said economic group were condemned indistinctly to pay to the foreign promissory buyers the price of the property plus interest until the actual day of its payment, as remedies for damages caused by the defendants for an unilateral breach of the contract, with bad faith being found in their behavior.
The promissory sellers failed to communicate the promissory buyers when the construction of the project began in order to collect the second installment of the purchase price of a condo unit, as required by a promise contract which only stated “second payment must be made 30 days after construction begins”.
Instead, the sellers disposed of the condo unit and sold it to a third party –when the promissory buyers were on time to make the second payment. The promissory buyers later received a letter from the developer informing of their unilateral decision to end the contract because payments were not received in a timely manner which allowed for early termination. The developer offered to return the deposits only if the promissory buyers signed a liability waiver.
Lombardi Aguilar & Garcia in Panama served as legal counsel for the promissory buyers. The legal team of the firm included Guadalupe Martinez-Casas, an attorney with experience in international arbitration cases before fora such as the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Lausanne, Switzerland. Ms. Martinez-Casas is a foreign law consultant in Argentine law, who previously served as attorney at the Buenos Aires firm of Llerena & Asociados. She is a graduate of Universidad Latina de Panamá (MBA), Universidad Torcuato di Tella (LLM and Economics), and Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA (LLB).
About Lombardi Aguilar & Garcia
Lombardi Aguilar & Garcia was created as an alternative for clients worldwide who seek fast, innovative and effective solutions to their legal problems. The firm currently provides services to individual and corporate clients in Panama as well in the Americas, Europe and Asia. Its partners maintain a commitment with professional ethics and social responsibility by participating in the board of directors of groups such as the Panama Bar Association, the German and the American Chambers of Commerce (AMCHAM) of Panama, and the Association of Chinese-Panamanian Professionals (APROCHIPA).
The firm centers its law practice in private client services and asset protection (Private Interest Foundations, Trusts), business structures (Offshore Corporations), tax planning, real estate and e-commerce. It also advices in areas of Law such as Corporate, Commercial, Intellectual Property, Maritime, Tax, and Immigration Law as well as related litigation that may arise.
For more information, contact +507 340-6444, +507 66388707, e-mail aaguilar (at) nysbar.com, or see: Lombardi Aguilar & Garcia http://www.laglex.com/
Keywords: Panama, real estate, property, investment, litigation
###
Receive press releases from Lombardi Aguilar & Garcia: By Email
RSS Feeds:
See also Lawsuits against developers increase
.
Thursday, May 29, 2008
Movement at former Ice Tower construction site
Ice Tower Reader
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Panamanian law gets you financing at 2% to 3% interest rates until 2008, or later ...
This has made financing the construction of houses an attractive business for banks, who after earning the tax credit can assign or transfer it to another company which has to pay a lot of taxes, but at a discount. The benefit stems from a little-known Panamanian law that gets you financing at 2% to 3% interest rates. The law expires this year 2008. http://mensual.prensa.com/mensual/contenido/2005/01/09/hoy/negocios/102717.html
For the buyer, this translates into having to repay a mortage loan at interest rates 3.2% to 4% less than what the government considers as the "Reference Rate", under Law 65 of October 29, 2003 , as long as the home is the main residence of the borrower and its purchase value does not exceed US$62,500.
What is more, if the home has a purchase value below US$16,000, the final interest rate to the borrower can be of 2%. http://www.martesfinanciero.com/history/2005/07/19/columnas/nacional_3.html
For example, the government Superintendencia sets the Reference Rate (TRM) at 8.25% http://www.pa-digital.com.pa/archive/11122003/finance01_slim.html A bank would get a 4% credit rate for financing the purchase ofa US$62,000 home, so the borrower would repay at a 4.25% rate. For a US$24,000 home, the bank gets a 5% credit, so the borower gets a 3.25% rate loan. With the current TRM at 6.5% under Memo CFL 3-85 2-2008 you can use this formula to calculate the final loan rate:
TRM - Bank Tax Credit points = Final Loan Rate
This means that the law does NOT provide benefits if:
1) The home was purchased for more than US$62,500 (this may get you a 700 sq. foot apartment or studio in the banking area, or a 2 bedroom house in a working-class commuter town),
2) The borrower expects to buy the property under a corporation,
3) The borrower already has more than 1 home under his/her own name.
4) The borrower is a foreigner buying a home to apply for a Solvency Visa (which requires an US$80,000 home)
Developers are recommending to increase the cap for benefits to homes up to US$85,000, since the US$62,500 limit was set under the first preferential interest rate law 3 of 1985. This benefit is regularly renewed thanks to the construction lobby, although many developers and real estate agent are expected to push buyers into signing the dotted line with the story that interest rates will go up.
If anybody misses the 2008 deadline, it is a good thing to know that the 5-year laws have been renewed like clockwork under Laws 3/85, 11/90, 5/94, 28/95, 30/99, 50/99 and 65/2003.
Saturday, February 02, 2008
23 developers fined for deceptive advertising
According to the Panama City Municipality website, the builders of 23 projects have been fined for up to US$100,000 per project for infringing municipal urban development regulations, incurring in deceptive advertising and deceiving buyers ("infringir las normas municipales de urbanismo, incurrir en la práctica de publicidad engañosa y estafar a los compradores"), as allowed by Law 6 of February 1, 2006, modified by law 45 of October 31, 2007.
According to the La Prensa February 1 print edition, some of the projects fined are:
Mystic Villas
The Plaza Costa del Este
The Plaza Obarrio
The Ritz
Altos del Golf Bijao
The World Gallery
Altos de Colina Campestre
Coral Hill
Park Plaza
PH Bambú
The Pavillion Tower
Alcalá Tower
The Municipal Engineering pointed out that all projects must have a pre-approved plan before advertising at home fairs, billboards or the media.
Thursday, December 06, 2007
Clauses in real estate contracts confirmed as abusive
After the 8th Circuit Judge rendered an initial May 31, 2007, decision in the Duque vs Neto S.A. case in favor of the buyer of a condo (see Tough times for sellers of Panama City skycrapers?), the Third Superior Tribunal confirmed the decision on appeal.
- A 5% unilateral increase in the purchase price if the seller deems that building materials have increased in price,
- The seller to withhold all previous downpayments if it unilaterally considers that the buyer is in default of agreement obligations,
- The seller to unilaterally decide not to build and simply return all downpayments without interest and with the seller waiving all claims for said action,
- All disputes to be subject to arbitration excluding the consumer protection courts.
The defendants Neto, S.A., are entitled to file a cassation action before the Supreme Court. Although precedent is not fully binding on other judges and this case does not declare void clauses in other contracts, it provides powerful arguments to those buyers suing developers with contracts that have similar clauses.
This consumer protection case serves only those buyers - foreign or locals - who have a single home in Panama. Those who are buying several properties for resale are not protected by the concept of abusive clauses. Needless to say, the expense of having a contract in Spanish translated into the buyer's language goes a long way towards avoiding running into an abusive clause.
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
You can sue a builder after 1 year
THE APARTMENT shall include the following warranties FOR REPARATIONS: one (1) year from the date of the certificate of occupancy, except in cases of negligence due to THE PROMMISORY BUYER’s use or abuse.
The term may vary to read 1 year from the date of signing of the promise agreement or registration of the final deed.
When faced with claims for tiles popping up from the expansion of poorly dried floors, leaks into penthouses during heavy rains, plywood kitchen furniture bulging because of water dripping from substandard plumbing, many builders point to said clause to tell the buyer to go somewhere else.
Enter the old 1917 Civil Code, which in Article 1343 states:
"The contractor of a building which was damaged for construction defects ("vicios de la construcción"), is liable for the damages and injuries if the defect ("ruina") occurred within a term of 10 years, counted from the date when the construction ended; the same liability, and for the same time, will have the architect who directs it, if he knows that the defect is due to the soil or the management.
"If the cause was the breach of the contractor to the contract conditions, the action for indemnization may last 15 years."
An essay RESPONSABILIDAD CIVIL POR DEFECTOS EN LA INDUSTRIA DE LA CONSTRUCCIÓN by Dr. Pedro Barsallo points out how the Spanish Supreme Tribunal has been holding that the developer must also be liable for thos contractor liability, under Article 1591 of the Spanish Civil Code, which has the same text as Article 1343. This is specially important in Panama, where a buyer may sign a promise to purchase agreement with one corporation (for example: LANDHOLDING, S.A.), at the offices of a developer (PROMOTOR DEVELOPMENTS, S.A.), which in turns hires another company to be the contractor and get construction permits (BUILDER ENGINEER, S.A.) and another corporation is subcontracted to do windows and/or kitchens (INCOMPETENT SUBCONTRACTORS, S.A.), usually all with the same directors and most likely the same shareholders.
The Panama Supreme Court has been quoting the essay in several decision against builders, such as :
ROBERT TOLEDANO et al v PROVENCO, S. A., VENTAS Y PROYECTOS, S. A., PROYECTOS Y EDIFICACIONES, S. A. and CIELO RASO, DIVISIONES Y AISLAMIENTO, S. A. (July 3, 2001): PROVENCO, S. A. and PROYECTOS Y EDIFICACIONES, S. A. were found liable for US$33,222K in damages, out of US$60K claimed for losses during 14 months of repairs at the Mar Plaza condo in Marbella.
PRODUCTOS DEL MAR Y DEL CAMPO, S. A. and PASTAS FRESCAS, S.A. vs BASTIDAS, S.A. and CONSTRUCTORA VILLARREAL, S.A. (January 30, 2003): CONSTRUCTORA VILLARREAL, S.A., was found liable for US$40K in damages caused to neighboring complainants while working in the land of BASTIDAS, S.A.
Monday, August 27, 2007
Town hall meetings on new skyscrapers are open to property owners
Neighbors rejected 3 out 4 zoning changes proposed in Bella Vista, where older homes in 2-lane streets are being demolished every week to make way for skyscrapers and restaurants with insufficient parking.
The calendar of meetings scheduled by MIVI are:
.27 AUGUST: San Francisco (includes Paitilla and Boca la Caja).
.28 AUGUST: Juan Díaz (includes everything at each side of the Southern Corridor starting from Costa del Este).
.31 AUGUST: Parque Lefevre (includes Panama Viejo).
.3 SEPTEMBER: Pedregal.
.4 SEPTEMBER: Las Cumbres (includes Cerro Azul).
.5 SEPTEMBER: 2nd Bella Vista meeting.
.6 SEPTEMBER: 24 de Diciembre (includes parts of Tocumen).
Foreigners cannot vote in Panama elections, but as property owners they can participate in these town hall meetings.
Sunday, July 15, 2007
Tough times for sellers of Panama City skycrapers?
| |
| 120 draft construction proyects have been approved for buildings above 25 stories and 80 more have been applied for. |
The value of construction permits in Panama City for Jan-Apr 2007 is of 321.9 million - 30% more than for the same 2006 period. 15 skyscrapers above 50-stories are already in the pipeline.
Ministry of Labor Executive Decree 15 of 2007 seeks to address the increasing number of worker fatalities in skycrapers by requiring that builders of projects above US$1million have an independent Safety Official. The issue was brought to the public's attention after several days of small demonstrations by trade unions.
The Executive Decree imposes a US$10,000 contribution to an Occupational Safety, Higiene and Health at Work for the Construction Industry Fund, run by the Ministry of Labor. Where I come from, that is called a tax, which cannot be enacted by Executive Decree, and is therefore unconstitutional.
Builders are not happy...
In a related story, the Minister of Housing signed July 13 a resolution imposing a 14-story limit on buildings around the Andres Bello park of the El Cangrejo neighborhood, as well as 5-meter clearance.
Residents of the 60-year old neighborhood lobbied the government for this limitation, being the first time residents succesfully curb the current construction boom. Destruction of sidewalks, debris (or workers) falling off construction sites, noise of machinery during evenings, cement poured unto streets and sewers (with the resulting overflow of fecal matter) and other inconveniences have made Panama City construction companies a very unwelcome corporate citizen, affecting current neighbors and even incoming snowbirds seeking their balcony in paradise.
In the meantime, the III Justice Tribunal has to decide on the appeal filed by a Panama corporation against a May 31 judgment of the 8th Civil Circuit Judge, whereby some clauses of a purchase agreement are deemed "abusive". The case started when the Consumer Protection Authority received the complaint of the buyer of a San Francisco apartment who signed a form agreement prepared solely by the seller with no negotiation. The judgment deemed as abusive 5 clauses which provide for:
- A 5% unilateral increase in the purchase price if the seller deems that building materials have increased in price,
- The seller to withhold all previous downpayments if it unilaterally considers that the buyer is in default of agreement obligations,
- Billing the buyer a 1% monthly charge on the amount outstanding after issuance of the occupation permit, whether the buyer uses the apartment or not,
- The seller to unilaterally decide not to build and simply return all downpayments without interest and with the seller waiving all claims for said action,
- All disputes to be subject to arbitration excluding the consumer protection courts.
We can expect that after the appeal is decided, the defendant sellers will file a cassation action before the Supreme Court, so a final decision will take years to be effective.
URLs (Yahoo registration required):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Live_in_Panama/files/Jurisprudencia/Sentencia_55_07_promesa_inmueble1.pdf
Thursday, July 05, 2007
Ice Tower Reader
http://biblioteca.prensa.com/contenido/2007/06/27/27-44a-noti2.html
F & F properties Ltd., Inc. |
Tel: (+507) 262 4978 / (+507) 262 0976
Fax: (+507) 279 0565
E-mail: Sf@sinfo.net
Web: http://www.ffproperties.net/
The Successful promoters of Platinum Tower, Century Tower, Bellagio Tower (Ander construction), Ocean One (comino soon) and the Mirage, F & F Propierties, Ltd., Inc., that mixed luxury, security and comfort, a combination which favours the pleasures of modern living, at excellent prices.
Renown for our prestige, solidity and reliability, and creators of exclusively designed projects with trademark excellent quality, F & F Properties, Ltd., Inc., exceeds the expectations of our clients. We are well aware of the demanding tases of clients who wish to live in an exclusive area at competitive prices. Our track record is Prof. Of our capacity to respond to these demands.
Characterized by our innovate style, F & F Properties, Ltd., Inc., has developed in only a fer years, architecural creations valuing over US $ 250 million, a track record that provides a guarantee for every project we launch.ee also:Interview with Saul Faskha, President of F&F Properties
...read more! (Spanish)
Entrevista con F&F Properties
Lo que sí pretendo es ponerme en contacto con alguna cadena hotelera para crear el mejor hotel del país en la Avenida Balboa donde poseemos un terreno para construir un edificio de unos 104 pisos con apartamentos de entre 100 m2 y 200 m2 que podría albergar también un hotel, y cuyo nombre será “ICE”.
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/archive/index.php/t-299809.html
El reto de llegar a la cima
Pinzon Lozano architects assume the challenge of designing the Ice Tower.
http://www.sovereignsociety.com/offshore1611.html
Whereas amateurs continue to speculate in red-hot "bubble" markets across the American coastline, Panama City is truly one of the greatest real estate investment deals of the decade.... The plans are even in the works for Latin America's largest hotel and condominium project - the 101-story Ice Tower, now under construction on Panama City's prestigious Avenida de Balboa bordering the Pacific Ocean approach to the Canal.... As the city continues to draw yield-hungry investors and bargain-seeking residents, Panama City is quickly becoming the next "big" thing for international real estate investors. ... (Sovereign Society, April 7, 2006)
The Mossfon Report
Another mega building project in Panama City comes with the recent announcement of the construction of the ‘Ice Tower’ by Saul Faskha. This residential skyscraper with more than 100 floors will be a landmark structure, being the tallest residential building in the world and the tallest building in Latin America. Ice Tower will have the same altitude as the Empire State Building in New York City. This project is also slated for completion in 2009. (May 2006)
http://primapanama.blogs.com/_panama_residential_devel/2006/12/is_the_ice_towe.html
Is the ICE Tower on ICE?
The developer has somebody to write letters to him...

Mario A. Muñoz, La Prensa
Another building will be made "with prices in accordance to market reality."
http://www.panama-guide.com/article.php/20070624132843583
Pilotec and Cemex Execute 1,150 m3 Concrete Pour at the Ice Tower
http://primapanama.blogs.com/_panama_residential_devel/2007/06/ice-tower-vanis.html
Ice Tower "Vanishes" in the local press.
http://biblioteca.prensa.com/contenido/2007/06/27/27-44a-noti2.html
The Real Estate Agents Association called for changes to the law which reduce the risk of buyers when a project is not built. The Consumer Protection Agency is analyzing some of the clauses in real estate contracts.
http://www.autoridaddelconsumidor.gob.pa/pdf/NP_INMOBILIARIAS_AJUSTAN_CONTRATOS_%2028-06-07%20MAF.pdf
Consumer Protection Agency informs that real estate companies are modifying their contracts, after Circuit Judge 8 deemed as "abusive" clauses which allow unilateral increases of 5% in price and charges of 1.5% from the moment the occupation permit is issued.
http://biblioteca.prensa.com/contenido/2007/06/27/27-44a-noti2.html
On May 31 the 8th Circuit Court declared "null as abusive" a clause similar to that in Ice Tower contracts which gave preferences to the seller to unilaterally terminate a contract.
http://mensual.prensa.com/mensual/contenido/2007/07/15/hoy/negocios/1048730.html
Ice Tower sellers only will refund downpayment to promissor buyers who sign quitclaim.
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2007/8/prweb543861.htm
http://mensual.prensa.com/mensual/contenido/2007/07/15/hoy/negocios/1048730.html
Javier Arias reveals that :
The project is being reduced to 85 stories because of cost increases,
Buyer Bruce Young was forced by the sellers to sign a quitclaim in order to have his downpayment refunded,
Eng. Veronica Ng denied that a quitclaim was been forced on buyers to get their refunds,
Architects Pinzon Lozano designed a plan for the morphed "Iron Tower" dated July 17, 2007, but the sellers deny their validity.
http://mensual.prensa.com/mensual/contenido/2007/08/09/hoy/negocios/1074918.html
Mario Munoz from La Prensa reports that one of the projects not approved by the Municipality, "the Iron Tower, the skyscraper which was to replace Ice Tower, was going to have its official launching in Miami this week, but the event was cancelled. The organizers said it had been a mistake.


